Phase 7: Post-Launch & Operations
Phase 7: Post-Launch & Operations
Modernization Overlay: Apply the 2026 Modernization Addendum controls (AI assist + RTG linkage) before phase exit.
Purpose
Support production system, monitor performance, fix urgent issues, and maintain SLAs.
Duration
Ongoing (first 2-4 weeks intensive, then ongoing)
Key Activities
7.1 Operational Monitoring
-
Lead: DevOps / SRE Team
-
Tools: Prometheus, Grafana, PagerDuty
Monitoring Dashboards:
Real-time Dashboard:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Payment App Production Monitoring │
├──────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ System Status: Healthy ✓ │ │ Uptime: 99.98% (Last 24h) │ │ Active Users: 2,450 (↑ 15% from yesterday)│ │ │ │┌─ Performance ─────────────────────────┐│ ││ Response Time (p95): 142ms ││ ││ Error Rate: 0.06% ││ ││ Transactions/sec: 45 ││ │└────────────────────────────────────────┘│ │ │ │┌─ Infrastructure ───────────────────────┐│ ││ CPU: 45% (↑ from 35% peak traffic) ││ ││ Memory: 62% ││ ││ Disk: 35% ││ ││ Database: 180ms latency ││ │└────────────────────────────────────────┘│ │ │ │┌─ Payment Processing ───────────────────┐│ ││ Success Rate: 99.98% ││ ││ Failed Payments: 2 (investigated) ││ ││ Avg Processing Time: 1.2s ││ │└────────────────────────────────────────┘│ └──────────────────────────────────────────┘
Alerting Rules:
Alert 1: High Error Rate Condition: Error rate > 1% for 5 minutes Action: PagerDuty → On-call engineer woken up Message: "High error rate detected in payments API" Context: Recent deployments, recent code changes
Alert 2: Database Performance Condition: Query time > 500ms (p95) for 5 minutes Action: PagerDuty → Database on-call Message: "Database performance degradation detected"
Alert 3: Memory Leak Condition: Memory usage increasing without leveling off Action: PagerDuty → Backend on-call Message: "Potential memory leak detected"
Alert 4: Payment Processor Down
Condition: Cannot connect to Stripe API for 2 minutes Action: PagerDuty → Backend + On-call Message: "Payment gateway offline - no transactions possible"
7.2 Incident Response
-
Lead: On-Call Engineer (rotates daily)
-
Tool: PagerDuty
Incident Response Process:
Incident Occurs (Error rate spikes): │
- ├─ 14:05: Alert triggered (error rate 2.5%) │ PagerDuty pages on-call engineer (John) │ ├─ 14:06: John joins war room (Slack channel #incidents) │ Opens monitoring dashboards │ Gathers logs from ELK Stack │
├─ 14:07: Root cause identified │ "Payment service consuming 100% CPU" │ Recent code change causing infinite loop │
├─ 14:08: Incident classified │ Severity: CRITICAL │ Status: INVESTIGATING │ ETA: 15 minutes │ ├─ 14:10: Mitigation options: │ Option A: Rollback code change (5 min) │ Option B: Scale payment service (3 min) │ Choice: Option B (quicker, safer) │ ├─ 14:12: Scale payment service
- │ Increase pods: 2 → 4
│ Error rate drops from 2.5% → 0.3% │ ├─ 14:13: Status: RESOLVED │ Incident resolved in 8 minutes │ System returned to normal │
-
├─ 14:20: Communication to users
-
│ "Brief service disruption 14:05-14:13 UTC
│ All payments were queued and processed successfully"
│
- └─ 15:00: Post-incident review
Root cause: Code change lacked load testing
Action items:
- Review code change (why not caught in testing?)
☐
Add performance test to CI/CD ☐
Update deployment process ☐
Incident Report (Filed in Jira):
-
├─ Incident ID: INC-001
-
├─ Severity: CRITICAL
-
├─ Duration: 8 minutes (14:05-14:13 UTC)
-
├─ Impact: 150 transactions delayed
-
├─ Root Cause: Inefficient loop in payment processor
-
├─ Impacted Requirements: REQ-PAY-017, REQ-PAY-021
-
├─ Resolution: Scaled pods and fixed code
-
├─ Action Items:
-
│ Add load testing to deployment process
☐ -
│ Review code review checklist for performance
☐ -
│ Link incident to impacted requirement IDs in traceability graph
☐ -
│└─ (Will be completed by PM within 1 week)
-
└─ Status: CLOSED
On-Call Rotation:
Weekly schedule (published in #oncall Slack):
Week 1:
-
├─ Mon-Tue: John (Backend expertise)
-
├─ Wed-Thu: Sarah (Frontend expertise)
-
└─ Fri-Sun: Alex (Full-stack, DevOps)
On-Call Responsibilities:
-
├─ Monitor production systems (active 24 hours)
-
├─ Respond to PagerDuty alerts (<5 min)
-
├─ Investigate and mitigate issues
-
├─ Communicate status to team
-
├─ Escalate if needed
-
└─ Document incidents
Escalation:
-
├─ Level 1: On-call engineer
-
├─ Level 2: Tech Lead (if L1 can't resolve)
-
├─ Level 3: PM (business decisions)
-
└─ Level 4: CEO (critical issues)
-
7.3 Support Ticket Management
-
Lead: Customer Support Team
-
Tool: Zendesk or Jira Service Desk
-
Support SLA (Service Level Agreement):
Priority Level | First Response | Resolution Target | Example
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── P1 Critical | <1 hour | <4 hours | "No one can pay" P2 High | <4 hours | <24 hours | "Payment failures" P3 Medium | <12 hours | <3 days | "UI bug" P4 Low | <24 hours | <1 week | "Typo in email"
Example tickets:
Ticket #101 Title: "Payment declining with insufficient funds message" Customer: acme@company.com Created: 2025-12-21 08:30 UTC Priority: P2 (High - revenue impacting) Description: "I'm trying to pay with my Amex but getting error 'Insufficient funds' even though my card has balance." Response (30 min): "I've escalated to our payments team. Your card should be re-enabled within 2 hours." Resolution (2h): "Issue was Stripe declining card for fraud check. Card is now unblocked. Please try again." Status: RESOLVED (customer confirmed payment success)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Ticket #102
Title: "Question about transaction history export" Customer: user123@example.com Created: 2025-12-21 14:00 UTC Priority: P4 (Low - question/feature request) Description: "Can I export my transaction history as CSV?" Response (by 15:00): "Good question! You can download CSV from Accounts → Downloads. Instructions here: [link]" Status: RESOLVED
Support Dashboard:
Customer Support Metrics (Daily): ├─ Open Tickets: 8
- │├─ P1: 1 (payment issue)
│├─ P2: 2 (feature questions)
│├─ P3: 3 (minor bugs)
│└─ P4: 2 (feedback/ideas)
-
├─ Average Response Time: 45 minutes
-
├─ Average Resolution Time: 6 hours
-
├─ CSAT Score: 4.3/5.0
-
├─ NPS (Net Promoter Score): +32
-
└─ Most common issue: Account verification (25% of tickets)
7.4 Weekly Status Reports
-
Lead: PM
-
Audience: Stakeholders, Executives
Weekly Status Report Template:
[Product Name] Weekly Status Report Week of: Dec 16-22, 2025
Executive Summary:
-
✓Product launched successfully (Dec 20) -
✓2,500+ active users in first 24 hours -
✓System performing well (99.98% uptime) -
✓One minor incident (resolved in 8 minutes) -
✓Customer satisfaction: 4.3/5.0
Key Metrics:
-
├─ Active Users: 2,500 (↑ 400% from soft launch) ├─ Transactions: 25,000 (↑ strong adoption)
-
├─ Error Rate: 0.08% (within targets)
-
├─ System Uptime: 99.98% (exceeded target 99.5%)
-
└─ Customer CSAT: 4.3/5.0 (target: >4.0)
What Went Well:
-
✓Deployment executed flawlessly -
✓Payment processing stable -
✓User adoption exceeded expectations -
✓Customer support responsive -
✓Infrastructure handled load well
What Needs Attention:
-
⚠Two users confused about transaction verification -
⚠Email notifications delayed (fixed in monitoring) -
⚠One edge case with currency conversion
Upcoming This Week:
-
├─ Monitor for issues during business hours
-
├─ Start gathering user feedback for roadmap
-
├─ Plan post-launch retrospective
-
└─ Design features for Q1 release
Risks & Mitigation:
-
├─ Risk: Payment processor outage could break revenue
-
│ Mitigation: Added backup processor, switch in 5 minutes ├─ Risk: Rapid user growth could overload database
-
│ Mitigation: Auto-scaling enabled, tested up to 10K users
-
└─ Risk: Security vulnerability in payment code
-
Mitigation: Regular security scans, code review process
Blockers/Dependencies:
-
├─ Stripe webhooks: Working (tested)
-
├─ Email service: Working (SendGrid)
-
└─ Analytics: Connected (Mixpanel)
Next Week Outlook:
-
├─ Monitor system performance
-
├─ Gather detailed user feedback
-
├─ Plan Q1 roadmap └─ Start work on first post-launch features
Success Criteria (Post-Launch)
✅ 99.5%+ uptime maintained ✅ <0.1% error rate ✅ >99.9% payment success rate ✅ CSAT >4.0/5.0 ✅ <1 hour incident resolution ✅ Support SLAs met ✅ Customer adoption ramping up